Blog

Andy_Burnham.jpg

Why I shall vote for Andy Burnham

Deciding for which leadership candidate to vote is as hard for me as for many other supporters.  I did not nominate a candidate because none of them looked very inspiring to me.  It seems to me that some of them are unlikely ever to inspire the wider electorate either.  None of the candidates has ever had for any length of time what many constituents would call a real job – it’s all been in and around the Westminster bubble – and that critique includes Jeremy Corbyn (for whom I am not voting) and Andy Burnham (for whom I am).

As the campaign has progressed, two candidates have grown into the role of putative leader (Burnham and Corbyn) and two have not (Cooper and Kendall).  I think that Andy Burnham is much more likely to grow the appeal of Labour, and win in 2020, than any other candidate.  However, it is not just about winning – important as that is.  It’s also about principles, and then about the consequent policies Labour should propose for the 21st century.

Andy Burnham is right that Labour’s mission must be to revive hope, by proposing policies to tackle the insecurities and inequalities which bedevil our society.  His manifesto sets out his principles and his proposals.  For example, he espouses:

  •  “a modern comprehensive education system, replacing tuition fees with a new graduate tax, and creating new university-style support for young people seeking apprenticeships.
  • “an affordable home for all to rent or own – by freeing councils to build new homes and introducing regulation of the private rented sector.
  • “a secure, well-paid job for everyone – by abolishing the youth rate National Minimum  Wage, establishing a true living wage for all ages, banning forced zero-hours contracts and unpaid internships.
  • “affordable and reliable transport for all – through a policy of progressive re-nationalisation of our railways and re-regulation of our buses.
  • “good care for all your needs from cradle to grave – and no one forced to sell their home – through a National Health and Care Service, bringing social care into the NHS.”

Andy Burnham is clear on inequality, saying:  “I want to lead a Party that doesn’t just talk about equality but one that acts on it. It is unacceptable that, in the Britain we live in, your gender, the colour of your skin, a disability, your sexuality or age can all be factors that mean you have a less than equal chance of getting on in life and a more than likely chance of earning less, being out of work, being stopped and searched, having health issues or being discriminated against.  As a country, we must stand together to eradicate hatred, prejudice and intolerance, rather than letting it spread. I will fight for a cross-government strategy on hate crime, from schools to social media, to tackle the growth in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.  I came into politics to fight for true equality. But if we want to change our country, we must also be prepared to change ourselves.”

Andy Burnham is clear on the deficit, saying:  “It is essential to have a plan to reduce the deficit, but the Tory Government’s approach of doing so almost exclusively through spending cuts will destroy the fabric of our communities and hurt the most vulnerable. Instead, I will bring forward a balanced Labour plan for a sustainable economy, based on growth and investment, fair pay, a re-balanced tax system, and a labour market that works for all.  Alongside it, I will promote an industrial strategy for Britain, devised and delivered in partnership with both business and trade unions, and with government investing for the future in infrastructure and the green economy.”

Andy Burnham is not afraid to risk the ire of the right-wingers, to be bold.  Without boldness, we cannot win in 2020.  For example, he overtly stands up for trades unions, for re-nationalising the railways, for access to justice, for challenging TTIP

I do not agree with every word of Andy Burnham’s manifesto – one seldom does in politics – but I do agree with enough to know that he is the best candidate.  This is a candidate after my own heart:  not afraid to assert and use the power of the state to regulate and to intervene when there is market failure.

 

Rob Marris

MP for Wolverhampton South West

Why I shall vote for Andy Burnham

Why I shall vote for Andy Burnham Deciding for which leadership candidate to vote is as hard for me as for many other supporters.  I did not nominate a candidate...

Rob Marris at the official opening of the letting agents Martin & Co.’s office at 11 Waterloo Road, July 2015.

Martin_and_Co_July_2015.jpg

Rob Marris opens Martin & Co Office

Rob Marris at the official opening of the letting agents Martin & Co.’s office at 11 Waterloo Road, July 2015.

Picture1.jpg

2015 was a disastrous election result for my Party.  

A welcome U-turn on the EU referendum. The economy next?

2015 was a disastrous election result for my Party.   Read more

Mind-logo-1-designed-by-Glazer.jpg

Strange title you may think ... but it is the silence that precedes the ultimate act of those who tragically decide to end their lives.

The Silence of Suicide

Strange title you may think ... but it is the silence that precedes the ultimate act of those who tragically decide to end their lives. Read more

 Rob_Declaration.jpg 

Rob Marris your newly elected MP for Wolverhampton South West

 

Thank You

   Rob Marris your newly elected MP for Wolverhampton South West   Read more

Renting.jpg

We need to tackle a modern housing crisis, because a severe shortage of new homes being built has priced millions of people out of the property market, and left many who want to buy living in private rented accommodation. 

The Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition has presided over the lowest peacetime level of housebuilding for almost a century, with the lowest rate of home ownership for 30 years, and fostered a market where buy-to-let landlords and foreign investors are snapping up properties before local people get a chance. 

Too many people are struggling to meet the costs of putting a roof over their heads.  Some are saving for a deposit year after year, while the dream of owning their own home seems further and further away.  Others find they have to move home frequently, sometimes unwillingly uprooting themselves from their work or friends, even having to change their children’s schools. 

The biggest house building programme in a generation

  • Labour’s plan will start construction on 1 million new homes by 2020, to deliver our promise of getting 200,000 homes built a year,
  • to try to ensure that developers build on land rather than hoarding it, there will be “use or lose it” powers for councils, who will be given the right to levy Council Tax on sites which remains undeveloped
  • a series of new garden cities
  • wider reform of the housing market.

A greater number of affordable homes, plus more social housing 

  • A greater number of affordable homes will be built year-on-year by strengthening affordable housing obligations (greatly diluted by the coalition) on developers, by prioritising capital investment, and by allowing Labour’s £5 billion Future Homes Fund to invest in housing associations developing affordable homes

Putting first-time buyers first

  • Help with a first home:  Labour will reduce Stamp Duty to zero for first-time buyers of homes worth up to £300,000 – a saving of as much as £5,000 for people seeking to get on the property ladder.
  • First Call:  Labour will give to first-time buyers, who have lived in an area for more than three years, the “first call” on up to half of homes built in their area.
  • Local First:  Labour will stop foreign buyers buying up properties before local buyers get a look in, by ensuring homes are advertised in local areas, and by increasing taxes paid by foreign buyers, and by increasing Council Tax for empty homes.  

Tenants 

Labour will help working people who rent privately.  The term “Generation Rent” is used to describe those who are being are priced out of the housing market, such as young people, and families with children, and middle income earners.

Labour will seek to ensure that the homes which local people want to buy are in fact built; and we will not turn our backs on Generation Rent, so we want to encourage those responsible landlords who provide decent homes for people and stable income for themselves.  

Our country needs a stable, decent, prosperous private rental market, where landlords and tenants can succeed together.  To this end, the next Labour government will introduce legislation in its first Queen’s speech to:

  • secure three-year tenancies for all people who want them, so landlords will no longer be able to terminate rental agreements simply to put rents up
  • cap rents, so they cannot rise by more than the rate of inflation (CPI) during those secure three-year tenancies
  • require landlords and letting agents to disclose the rent levels charged to previous tenants, so that householders can negotiate the best possible deal at the start of their contract
  • a national register of landlords, which will enable rogue landlords to be identified and judge whether their property meet basic standards. 
  • penalise rogue landlords by reducing buy-to-let tax relief for those who own properties which do not meet basic standards a ban on letting agent fees charged to tenants, saving the average tenant-household £625 over the next Parliament

Rob Marris, Labour's parliamentary candidate for Wolverhampton South West

Generation Rent: a better and more secure future

We need to tackle a modern housing crisis, because a severe shortage of new homes being built has priced millions of people out of the property market, and left many...

From: Hospital Consultant
Sent: 20 April 2015 10:04
To: Rob Marris
Subject: Re: NHS privatisation

Dear Rob

Many thanks for this (= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nhs-struggling-to-monitor-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-its-services-outsourced-to-private-providers-10187339.html), which I had not read or come across.  While I knew of the high profile scandals e.g. Winterbourne, West Country GP services etc., the data on the lack of monitoring and inspection are new, even to me.  It does not surprise me however.

Clinical Commissioning Groups each consist of 12 GPs doing commissioning part time, plus 1 lay person, plus 1 nurse; plus 1 Consultant from outside the area doing commissioning as an add-on.  That's it!

Whilst Monitor has over 300 staff, in 2014 a Public Accounts Committee report found that only 7 of them are healthcare professionals

Meanwhile, the Care Quality Commission has had to halve its inspections this year – because of lack of human and financial resources.

Outsourcing is required as a last resort, if local or adjacent NHS providers can't deliver.  However it brings massive extra risks for patients and loved ones – and taxpayers.

Having been a General Medical Council specialist Assessor for several years until 2013, I am well aware of the considerable limitations of the regulators (e.g. GMC, HCPC, NMC, etc.) which are due to lack of human and financial resources.   Healthcare professionals who are able to regulate must still be in active practice, and their NHS employer, colleagues, and patients can't spare them much time; ditto for lay assessors, who often still actively work in other sectors

Therefore, much of the "regulation" is done voluntarily, unpaid, at night and weekends, with such healthcare professionals and lay assessors reading the papers sent to them by GMC, NMC, HCPC, about a doctor/nurse/midwife about whom concerns have been raised.

Conversely, NHS providers have a whole lattice of governance, monitoring and, most importantly, peer feedback and scrutiny which the private providers may well lack.

Some private providers do offer excellent service for patients.  However, as someone who now is more worried about my own future healthcare, and that of my loved ones, than anything else, my view is that NHS providers should be the providers of first choice when commissioning healthcare

Very best wishes

 

Dr_Illustartion.jpg

A hospital consultant writes...

From: Hospital Consultant Sent: 20 April 2015 10:04 To: Rob Marris Subject: Re: NHS privatisation Dear Rob Many thanks for this (= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nhs-struggling-to-monitor-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-its-services-outsourced-to-private-providers-10187339.html), which I had not read or come...

Labour is the only party that has committed to retaining language qualifications.  Crucial languages qualifications face the axe under the Tories. 

Here’s Labour’s video promising to save these subjects. You can watch and share the video via this link: http://youtu.be/Cv5TYCct4dg

Mr Tristram Hunt, Labour’s Shadow Secretary of State for Education says:  For Britain to succeed in the world, we need to be an outward looking nation, harnessing the age-old British spirit that has always sought to further our place in the world, not close ourselves off from it.

“With Labour, we will not shy away from our proud tradition as an internationalist party.  That is why I have been very clear on the language qualifications facing the axe: not on my watch.  Labour is the only party committed to saving these crucial language qualifications.  Losing them would limit our place in the world.”

A future Labour government is committed to saving these language qualifications.  Labour’s commitment is a stark contrast to Tory Minister Nick Gibb’s dismissal of the “small numbers” of people undertaking these important qualifications.

The move from Labour comes as the major examination awarding bodies called OCR and AQA have decided to scrap dozens of qualifications in foreign languages, including Punjabi, Gujarati, Polish, Bengali, Modern Hebrew, Turkish, and Portuguese.  This decision comes at a time when the Confederation of British Industry has identified the growing need for more foreign language skills by UK companies who want to break into new fast-growing markets.

This decision only emerged stealthily when OCR and AQA published information about the new qualifications which they will start to offer, in response to Mr David Cameron’s government’s deadline for the introduction of new qualifications.  The awarding bodies published lists of subjects which they would discontinue under the new examination changes that have been rushed through by David Cameron’s Government.

During a debate in the House of Commons just before the start of the General Election campaign, the Conservative /Liberal Democrat coalition government minister Mr State Nick Gibb dismissed the “small numbers” of uptake in these subjects.  Whilst he did admit that “British firms will increasingly demand staff who are fluent in languages such as Polish and Turkish as they seek new markets and opportunities”, he then refused to commit his coalition government to securing a future for qualifications in less studied languages.  Both Mr Cameron and his education spokesperson Ms Nicky Morgan have refused to make a commitment to saving these qualifications.

You can access the list of qualifications that AQA will discontinue here: http://www.aqa.org.uk/supporting-education/policy/gcse-and-a-level-changes/structure-of-new-a-levels and here http://www.aqa.org.uk/supporting-education/policy/gcse-and-a-level-changes/structure-of-new-gcses. You can access the list of qualifications that OCR will discontinue here: http://www.ocr.org.uk/news/view/%20redeveloping-gcses-and-a-levels-for-2017/

The CBI annual Education & Skills Survey 2014 found that two thirds of firms (65%) identified a need for foreign language skills as they seek to make inroads into fast-growing markets:  http://www.cbi.org.uk/media-centre/press-releases/2014/06/more-firms-demanding-language-skills-to-break-into-new-markets-cbi-pearson-survey/

Coalition government minister Mr Gibb’s remarks during the House of Commons Debate can be found here: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm150324/debtext/150324-0004.htm#15032473000009

Rob Marris, Labour candidate for wolverhampton South West

Only Labour will save crucial language qualifications: Punjabi, Gujarati, Bengali, Modern Hebrew, Polish, and Turkish.

Labour is the only party that has committed to retaining language qualifications.  Crucial languages qualifications face the axe under the Tories.  Here’s Labour’s video promising to save these subjects. You...

Labour has launched its manifesto for women, setting out how Labour will enable women to fulfil their potential, as part of a plan to raise living standards for all.

Labour will help grandparents who want to be more involved in caring for their grandchildren, by consulting on allowing grandparents to share in parents' unpaid parental leave, thereby enabling them to take time off work without fear of losing their job.

Parents often rely on other family members – particularly grandparents – to help them juggle work and childcare.  More than half of all mothers rely on grandparents for childcare when they first go back to employment after maternity leave.  Correspondinlghly, two-thirds of grandparents with grandchildren aged under 16 provide some childcare.

Yet public policy hasn't kept up with the reality of families' lives, with 1.9 million grandparents giving up a job, reducing their hours, or taking time off work to look after their grandchildren.  70% of grandparents say the caring contribution they make is not currently recognised.

To assist grandparents to help their families and to stay in their jobs, Labour will consult on what flexibilities would make the system work better for families and businesses, given changing patterns of care.  This could include allowing grandparents to share in parents' unpaid parental leave. So those grandparents can be more involved in caring for their grandchildren.

Labour's women's manifesto also sets out measures to:women_manifesto.jpg

  • lessen low pay, by increasing the Minimum Wage to more than £8 by October 2019.
  • address the gender pay gap, with new pay transparency rules for all large employers.
  • extend free childcare from 15 to 25 hours a week for working parents of 3 and 4 year olds, funded by increasing the Bank Levy. 
  • guarantee access for parents of primary-age children to wraparound childcare 8am-6pm through primary schools.
  • protect the Sure-Start budget, and open up an additional 50,000 childcare places.
  • double paid Paternity Leave from 2 to 4 weeks, and increase that pay to the equivalent of a full week’s work at the National Minimum Wage, so that more families can afford to take up their entitlements.
  • support healthy relationships, by introducing age-appropriate compulsory sex and relationship education.
  • tackle violence against women and girls by appointing a new commissioner to enforce national standards on tackling domestic and sexual abuse, and by strengthening the law.
  • provide more stable central funding for women's refuges and for rape crisis centres.

Rob Marris, Labour Candidate for Wolverhampton South West

Women’s Equality - Labour's women's manifesto

Labour has launched its manifesto for women, setting out how Labour will enable women to fulfil their potential, as part of a plan to raise living standards for all. Labour...

Labour’s manifesto starts from the idea that UK only succeeds when working people succeed. By securing the nation’s finances, we will be able to improve the finances of the people of Britain.

The manifesto is different from manifestos which Labour has published in the past.  Instead of a list of new spending commitments, the very first page of this Manifesto sets out Labour’s plan to secure the country’s finances – with a Budget Responsibility Lock guaranteeing that every manifesto policy is paid for without a single penny of extra borrowing.

People want change, and a better future, but understandably they want to know that Labour can and will make progress while securing the country’s finances.  This manifesto answers that question with a plan for big reform, not for big spending.

That responsible approach contrasts with an increasingly desperate Conservative campaign.  Not only have they increased the National Debt by well over 50% in the last 5 years (failed austerity:  all the pain, but none of the gain), but they are now making promises for which they have no idea how they would pay.  There is nothing more dangerous for the NHS than saying you’ll protect it yet having no idea from where the money is coming.  It is an approach which would lead to yet more broken Conservative promises (remember their promise 5 years ago not to re-organise the NHS … !):  either they will put up taxes, or break their NHS promise.

So Labour’s manifesto and this election campaign show that we are the party of change and the party of sound public finances as well.

Labour’s plan is more ambitious, because we start from a clear commitment to balance the books, but it does not stop there.  On the foundation of a plan to secure the nation’s finances, we will improve the finances of the working people of UK by:

  • rewarding hard work – by raising the Minimum Wage, banning exploitive zero hours contracts, capping energy bills, and backing small businesses
  • sharing prosperity – by guaranteeing apprenticeships, cutting university tuition fees, getting 200,000 homes built a year by 2020, and devolving powers to every part of UK.
  • building a better UK – ensuring that the NHS has time to care, opening up our politics, and being a confident, outward-looking country once again. 

In short, it’s time to restore hope.

Securing government finances with a Budget Responsibility Lock

The very first page of Labour’s manifesto sets out our plan to secure the country’s finances, with a new Budget Responsibility Lock which will guarantee that:

  • every policy in this manifesto is paid for, and does not require additional government borrowing.
  • a Labour government will cut the deficit every year.
  • we will try to get National Debt falling with a surplus on the current budget as soon as possible in the next parliament. 

 

Every policy in this manifesto is paid for, and does not require additional borrowing 

This manifesto sets out a detailed plan to build a better UK, but without one policy that requires additional borrowing.  Where policies do cost money, we have set out how they are paid for.  For example:

  • a £2.5bn NHS Time to Care fund, from a Mansion Tax on properties over £2m, a levy on tobacco firms, and closing a hedge fund tax avoidance loophole.
  • 25 hours of childcare for working parents of 3 and 4 year olds, paid for by increasing the Banking Levy by £800m.
  • capping class sizes for 5, 6, & 7 year olds, from ending the Free Schools programme.
  • cutting Business Rates for small business properties, from not going ahead with another cut to Corporation Tax.

Labour’s approach is to address the root causes of problems, by implementing big reforms which do not require additional spending.  Instead of simply spending taxpayers’ money to support households, we will:

  • help with energy costs by capping energy bills, and by reforming the broken, rip-off energy market.
  • make work pay, by banning exploitive zero hour contracts, and raising the Minimum Wage to £8 an hour by 2020.

In contrast, the Conservatives are making a growing list of commitments for which they have no way of paying, and so they would be bound to break their promises on:

  • £10bn of unfunded tax cuts.
  • £8bn for the NHS.
  • £1.8bn on a rail fares’ freeze.
  • No tax rises (remember that the Coalition broke a specific promise in 2010, and increased VAT to 20%?).

We will also legislate to require all major parties to have their manifesto spending and tax commitments independently audited by the Office for Budget Responsibility, because  the Conservative Party blocked Labour’s proposal to allow the OBR to audit party manifestos this time.

 

A Labour government will cut the deficit every year. 

In 2010 Mr David Cameron said: “In five years’ time, we will have balanced the books.”  It is now clear that the Tories have failed.

  • the Tories claim that they would balance the budget in 2017-18, three years later than they originally claimed they would do.
  • they have borrowed £200 billion more than they planned in this Parliament, borrowing more in four and a half years than the last Labour Government did in 13 years, thereby increasing the National Debt by well over 50%.
  • the Conservative/Liberal Democrat government is still running an annual deficit of close to 5% of GDP – far higher than most Western countries.
  • in five out of 11 Budgets or Autumn Statements, Mr George Osborne has broken his fiscal rule that debt should be falling by 2015-16.

These failures mean that the next Labour government will inherit borrowing of £75 billion for 2015-16.  Some people argue that the deficit simply doesn’t matter if you care about a fair country.  That is wrong.  It matters because, unless there is a strategy for dealing with the deficit, it is working people and their public services which end up paying the price

So the Labour manifesto confirms that the first line of our first Budget will be:  “This Budget cuts the deficit every year”; and that we will only lay a Budget before the House of Commons which cuts the deficit every year, which the OBR will independently verify.

We will be able to deliver this because:

  • Departmental budgets will fall every year – outside protected areas like Education and the NHS – until the deficit is eliminated.
  • tough choices, including scrapping Winter Fuel Payments for the richest pensioners, and capping Child Benefit rises
  • a cap on overall Social Security spending, plus measures to tackle the long-term drivers of such spending; e.g. low pay and low house-building.
  • fair taxes:  we will reverse the Tory millionaires’ tax cut, ensuring those earning over £150,000 pay the 50p Income Tax rate; and tackle tax avoidance, including abolishing the non-domiciles loophole.
  • making government more efficient, with a new emphasis on prevention and devolution; for example integrating health and social care to keep people out of hospital, and focusing on public health to cut child obesity.

 

We will get National Debt falling and a surplus on the annual government budget as soon as possible in the next Parliament.

Labour’s promises to try to get National Debt falling and a surplus on the annual government budget as soon as possible in the next Parliament.  This is the right fiscal approach, because we need to ensure that tax revenues more than cover day-to-day spending, and we need to prevent debt interest payments from mounting up.  Our tough and approach will balance the books through an economy based on high wages and high skills, spending reductions, and fair choices on tax.

In contrast, the Conservatives’ ideology is to carry on cutting public services year after year, even after the nations’ books have been balanced.  They wish to make government spending a permanently lower proportion of GDP – indeed, in autumn 2014 Mr Osborne proposed to take our country’s spending back to the 1930s.  Because of that ideology, they have set out extreme plans, including cutting government spending even more in 2015 to 2018 than they did in 2010 to 2015, including cutting twice as much in 2016 to 2017 as they did in 2015 to 2016.

 

Labour’s promises and policies are fully funded 

Every policy in this manifesto is paid for and does not require additional borrowing.  A Labour government will cut the deficit every year and the OBR will verify this.  We will try to get National Debt falling and a surplus on the annual government budget as soon as possible in the next Parliament.

 

Higher living standards

Cap energy bills until 2017 and give the regulator the power to cut bills this winter, ban exploitive zero-hours contracts, raise the Minimum Wage to £8, and provide 25 hours of free childcare a week.

  • capping energy bills and giving the regulator powers to cut bills will not require additional government spending.
  • banning exploitive zero-hours contracts will not require additional spending.
  • Raising the Minimum Wage to £8 will not require additional spending, and will cut Social Security spending.
  • We will raise the Bank Levy by £800 million, in order to provide 25 hours of free childcare to working parents of 3 and 4 year olds.

 

An NHS with the time to care

We will join up services from home to hospital, guaranteeing GP appointments within 48 hours, and cancer tests within 1 week.

  • 20,000 more nurses and 8,000 more GPs will be paid for by a Mansion Tax on properties worth over £2 million, a levy on tobacco firms, and by clamping down on tax avoidance.
  • guaranteed GP appointments within 48 hours will be delivered by having 8,000 more GPs, and by investing £100 million in GP practices, funded by cutting the Tories NHS red tape and bureaucracy with their silly NHS competition requirements.
  • guaranteed cancer tests within 1 week to be funded within the Time to Care Fund through the levy on tobacco firms.

 

Controls on immigration

People who come here won’t be able to claim Benefits for at least two years, and we will introduce fair rules making it illegal for employers to undercut wages by exploiting workers.

  • restricting access to Social Security and Tax Credits will not require additional spending.
  • introducing fair rules to stop undercutting and exploitation will not require additional government spending (save for a relatively small amount on enforcement).

 

A country where the next generation can do better than the last

University tuition fees reduced to £6,000 a year, an apprenticeship for every school leaver who gets the basic grades, and smaller class sizes for 5, 6, and 7 year-olds.

  • reducing tuition fees to £6,000 will be funded by restricting Pensions Tax relief on contributions made by those on annual incomes of over £150,000.
  • smaller class sizes for 5, 6, and 7 year-olds will be funded by ending the Free Schools programme.

 

Cut and then freeze Business Rates for over 1.5 million smaller business properties – funded by not going ahead with the Tories planned cut of Corporation Tax rate from 21% to 20%.

 

Introduce a starting 10p rate of tax – funded by scrapping the Tories’ marriage tax allowance (which would disproportionately help the well-to-do).

 

A guaranteed, paid job for all young people who have been out of work for one year, and for all those over 25 years old and out of work for two years – funded by a one-off Bank Bonus Tax in the first year, and by restricting Pensions Tax relief on contributions made by those on annual incomes of over £150,000.

 

Abolition of the hated and unfair Bedroom Tax – funded by ending the Shares for Rights scheme, reversing the scrapping of the Schedule 19 charge, and by tackling disguised employment in the construction industry

 

Labour will not borrow more

It is the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition which has borrowed over £200 billion more than they planned, and increased the National Debt by well over 50% in just 5 years.

Our primary pledge is that our manifesto will contain no proposals for any new spending which would need to be paid for by additional borrowing.  We will try to cut the deficit every year to get the current budget in balance and the National Debt falling as soon as possible.

 

Labour will not borrow more than the Tories (it would be hard to do so anyway!)

The Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition might be able to cut spending, but the last five years have shown they can't cut the government deficit nearly as much as they had planned – it’s still running at close to 5% of GDP – because their inept economic policies choked off the economic growth they inherited from Labour in May 2010 (0.9% rise in GDP in the first 6 months of 2010), and stalled the economy (another Tory recession … ), and thereby decreased tax revenues (fewer people in work, lower wages) and increased the bill for Social Security  bill (ditto)

Labour’s manifesto will contain no proposals for any new spending paid for by additional borrowing – in contrast to the Conservatives, who have so far made billions of pounds of commitments for which they have not said how they will pay.  

 

£30 billion of cuts?

Labour MPs voted for the Charter for Fiscal Responsibility.  It called for the UK government’s annual budget to be balanced.  That is a target which Labour continues to support. The Charter does not necessitate running a large annual surplus on the back of extreme cuts to public services – which is the Tories’ announced plan.

 

Balancing the books

Labour’s approach is entirely consistent with support for the Charter; namely, to try to cut the government deficit every year so we can – unlike the failed Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition – get the annual budget in balance and National Debt falling as soon as possible.  How fast a Labour government can go will depend on the state of the economy, including what happens to wages and growth, and events around the world.

Rob Marris, Labour candidate for Wolverhampton South West

Securing the country’s finances

Labour’s manifesto starts from the idea that UK only succeeds when working people succeed. By securing the nation’s finances, we will be able to improve the finances of the people...

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.